Friday, December 12, 2025

Friday Curmudgeon: Who Edits this "Newspaper"?


There was a news story in the local newspaper, a major paper owned by one of the world's richest men recently that made the curmudgeon in me come out. It was a story about a murder that happened in Prince George's County, Maryland. 

The text of the article read in part as follows: 

Nader said it appears that the shooter knew the deceased, chased him down and shot him in the food court.

My comments on reading this: 

  • Shooting the deceased was a little excessive, if he was the deceased, he was by definition already dead. 
  • How do you chase a person who is deceased?
  • Is it murder to shoot a person who is deceased?*
  • What part of the body is the food court? 
  • Is it painful to be shot in the food court? (Well not if you are already deceased.)  

Another passage read: 

Authorities said they think the attacker fled the scene with a car.**  

My Comments on reading this: 

  • Did he steal a car?
  • Was he carrying the car? 
  • Pushing the car?
  • Did he have a tow truck? 
Now I know my writing is not perfect. I also don't claim to be a professional journalist, I am not being paid by a billionaire to report the local news.  That being said, Yorkshire pudding would have edited this in about 30-seconds for clarity while retaining meaning. Hell, I could have edited this in about two minutes to mean what this person intended to say. A change of two or three words in these two sentences move this from being a bad joke, to a solid short news report. The article was only 250-300 words, it was not rocket science. Without editing it was compost. The only logical conclusion is that NO ONE is editing the newspaper. 

* Law students are torchered  tortured with that question every year. It is attempted murder if the shooter believed the person was alive when they shot them, even if the person was already deceased. 

** https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/12/03/shooting-mgm-national-harbor-hotel-casino-maryland/ 

19 comments:

  1. Print journalist here all self edit, and it shows. I would have expected the cartoon cancelling newspaper would do better than your example.
    Torchered? I think it is attempted murder if the person was believed to be alive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With my self editing, I miss clear mistakes.

      Delete
  2. Thank you for this! I would have had the identical reaction. And I HAVE when I’ve read “journalism” like this. So many already deceased are being re-deceased! lately. Who knew the foodcourt was a vital organ? Where are journalists like Steve Reed when you need them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The old drunks from the newsrooms of the past, are aghast.

      Delete
    2. Everyone makes mistakes, but these are professional journalists and editors spewing out this tripe. And so many journalists now use “lead” instead of “led.”

      Delete
  3. How do you chase a person who is deceased? You put on your running shoes and your lime green lycra tracksuit then you run - not like hell but to hell.
    Is it murder to shoot a person who is deceased? It depends if he is a resident of Washington Deceased.
    What part of the body is the food court? Oh that's an easy one. It's the belly of course.

    P.S. Mr Nit Picker tells me that the word is "tortured" and not "torchered". Would it be torture if you were to ask The Human Hamster to kindly be your blog proofreader? That guy rarely makes a mistake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good catch, I struggled with the spelling on that word, the edit has been made. I love the Hamster too much to ask him to proof my posts.

      Delete
  4. I guess editing is a dying art. Thankfully this line:

    "What part of the body is the food court? "

    will have me smiling all day!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to hear, I made someone smile for the day.

      Delete
  5. It was probably written by AI.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could be, maybe an Ai editor would spot the errors.

      Delete
  6. I thought exactly as you did when I read that quote from the newspaper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No editor would have let that by.

      Delete
  7. This had me laughing (which is probably not the reporter's intent). Maybe the editor quit because they didn't want to work for that controlling billionaire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The staff has been gutted over the past decade.

      Delete
  8. One of my most used aphorisms to friends and foes alike is "Everybody needs an editor".

    ReplyDelete
  9. AI at its finest. Because computers do everything better than people.

    ReplyDelete